Creating a System of Care for Families and Children By Ashley H. Brock and Tara S. Wass

February 21st, 2012

 

Families whose children have complex needs often require help from more than one agency or system. Imagine the challenges facing the family of 7-year-old Johnny.

Johnny has already been held back a grade in school. His emotional outbursts make it difficult for him to be in the classroom environment and his teachers suspect he has a learning disability. In addition, Johnny gets bullied at school because he acts differently than the other kids. The bullying seems to increase his emotional outbursts. At home, Johnny directs his negative energy toward his 3-year-old little sister. Who do Johnny’s parents turn to for help?

In Johnny’s case, his parents may seek help from teachers, school counselors, a primary care doctor, child psychologists, and family therapists. If care is not coordinated across agencies, then each of these professionals will create a different plan of care for Johnny, which may duplicate or conflict with his other plans. When communities or states have an integrated system of care, providers work together to create a single coordinated plan of care for the child and the family that maximizes access to effective services while minimizing excess costs and bureaucratic barriers for families.

Colorado agencies are working to create an integrated system of care that will help the families of children with serious emotional disturbances access the services they need across multiple agencies. While a truly integrated system is not yet in place, the Colorado System of CARE (Collaboration, Access, Resources, and Education) project launched by the Division of Behavioral Health should move our state closer to that goal.

As part of this federally funded initiative, the Colorado System of CARE project leaders have selected eight “Communities of Excellence” (see blue areas on map) to expand the system of care in their communities and work with the State of Colorado to develop the infrastructure for a statewide integrated system of care. These communities have demonstrated their efforts to coordinate care between health/mental health, social services, juvenile justice, education, and other agencies. The grants will provide these communities with funds to do things such as hire family partners, plan data sharing, conduct research, and offer Wraparound training in their communities.

Child Well-Being Index Ranks Colorado 26th in the U.S By Krista

February 10th, 2012

The Foundation for Child Development’s (FDC), Child Well-Being Index (CWI), tracks how young people in the United States have fared since 1975 via a national, research-based composite measure.  The index combines national data from 28 indicators across seven domains into a single number that reflects overall child well-being.  Based on this information, the Foundation report ranks Colorado 26th nationally on these child well-being components.

The seven quality-of-life domains considered are: Family Economic Well-Being, Health, Safe/Risky Behavior, Educational Attainment, Community Engagement, Social Relationships, and Emotional/Spiritual Well-Being.

According to the Denver Post, “The study’s key findings are that states with higher income taxes are better for children, and public investments in children, such as education spending, matter a great deal.”   According to the Tax Foundation,” Colorado has dropped 18 places in the state/local tax burden ranking over the last 30 years. It levies every major tax, but the rate on each is among the lowest in the country.” “Spending discipline in the form of Taxpayer Bill of Rights has also helped the state keep tax rates low,” states the Tax Foundation.

In most cases Colorado’s children fared slightly better than the national average.  However, as reported in the The Denver Post, only 86.7 percent of Colorado children had health insurance, compared to a national average of 89.2 percent.  Despite having the seventh worst coverage in the United States in 2007, Colorado’s figures have been improving as more children are enrolled in Medicaid and the Child Health Plan Plus.

Other areas where Colorado’s children face more problems than their peers across the country include Colorado’s suicide rate for children ages 10-19 (6.19 deaths to every 1,000 children) which is nearly twice as high as the national average of 3.97. Colorado also has had a higher incidence of births to mother’s ages 15 to 19 (43.4 births per 1,000) compared with the national rate which stands at 42.5.

CRS applauds the efforts of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to focus its program efforts towards “winnable battles” in areas such as unintended pregnancy, injury prevention and mental health/substance abuse.  Hopefully by focusing on problems such as child health and welfare, where Colorado has a capacity to improve, Colorado’s standing on the Child Well-Being Index will improve in future years.

 

Article on Patient-Centered Medical Homes by Paul Nutting One of Top Viewed by Health Affairs Readers By Krista Vachon

January 26th, 2012

The Center for Research Strategies would like to congratulate our own, Dr. Paul A. Nutting, along with, Benjamin F. Crabtree, William L. Miller, Kurt  C. Stange, Elizabeth Stewart, and Carlos Jaen, for their published paper: Transforming Physician Practices To Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Lessons From The National Demonstration Project, which, based on online downloads, has made the top ten most read papers published in Health Affairs in 2011.

According to Health Affairs, the paper addresses the role of primary care practices in upcoming health reform discussions and notes “Many commentators view the conversion of small, independent primary care practices into patient-centered medical homes as a vital step in creating a better-performing health care system.”

From June 1, 2006, to May 31, 2008, the authors researched results from the country’s first national medical home demonstration and identified

Dr. Paul A Nutting

some of the difficulties associated with these innovations.  According to the article, “Among other features, the transformation process requires an internal capability for organizational learning and development; changes in the way primary care clinicians think about themselves and their relationships with patients as well as other clinicians on the care team; and awareness on the part of primary care clinicians that they will need to make long-term commitments to change that may require three to five years of external assistance.”

In conclusion, the authors comment that, “Transforming primary care requires synchronizing practice redesign with development of the health care “neighborhood,” which is made up of a broad range of health and health care resources available to patients.” The paper also discusses the requirements for a payment reform system to support practice development and a policy environment to define practical expectations and time frames for the implementation of suitable innovations.

To view Dr. Nutting’s article, visit the Center for Research Strategies website (www.crsllc.org)